Voter ID Trial Day 3: The Courage to Stand Up Against Voter ID
Voter ID plaintiff Asher Schor (center) |
Day 3 of the voter ID trial today featured eight witnesses
from diverse backgrounds and experiences, including a county official, two
state officials, and a public interest attorney. While these witnesses provide
important context and density to the case against voter ID, the most compelling
stories continue to come from those witnesses in challenging circumstances.
Today’s hearing included a woman whose birth state has no record of her birth,
a teenager with autism, and a young transgender man who worries about the
impact of voter ID on his community.
Taylor Floria and Asher Schor knew exactly what they were
doing when they agreed to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs. In testimony,
both young men made clear that they care about this issue because of the impact
it will have on their respective communities.
Taylor is 19 and lives in Chester County. He just registered
to vote and is excited to vote for the first time. Taylor also has autism. Before
the voter ID law, he would be able to vote in November’s election. If the voter
ID law is not overturned, he will lose the chance to cast his first ballot.
Unlike previous witnesses, Taylor has all of the documents
he needs to get a non-driving ID- a birth certificate, a Social Security card,
and proof of residency. But Taylor has difficulty with excessive stimulation.
Riding in a vehicle also wears him out and gives him motion sickness due to a
physical condition. The nearest PennDOT drivers license center is nearly an
hour from his home. If the car ride doesn’t wear him down, Taylor then must
deal with the disorder of the license center. His autism makes it difficult or
just plain impossible to handle the noise, the lack of decorum, the lighting, and
other stimulation at the center.
Taylor’s mother, Sandra Carroll, testified that Taylor would
probably be mute by the time he got to the clerk. In fact, he tried once to get
an ID but had to leave the center before he could get it.
So how did he get to Harrisburg and how was he able to
testify in a courtroom? Marian Schneider of Advancement Project asked him this question in direct questioning. Taylor testified that he and his
mother traveled to Harrisburg yesterday so that he could have a day and a night
to recuperate from the drive. He also said that the order of the courtroom- the
decorum in how people dress, the quiet, the order that stems from the judge’s
presence- enabled him to testify. That kind of order and decorum does not exist
in a PennDOT license center.
Taylor, who earns straight As at the cyber school and
technical school he attends, told the court that he chose to testify because he
wanted “to explain how it’s difficult for me and for people like me.” He added,
“I hope to advocate for them.”
Asher Schor, meanwhile, has a driver’s license from PennDOT.
The problem? Asher is transgender. His license photo shows his appearance
before he started his gender transition, and the gender marker is female. Asher
started testosterone treatments last November, which he testified has given him
facial hair, altered his facial structure, and redistributed his body fat.
If the voter ID law is implemented, Asher worries that he
and other transgender Pennsylvanians will lose the vote at the hands of a poll
worker who won’t accept his ID. As a legal assistant for a prisoner advocacy
group, Asher recently endured an experience with a U.S. marshall at the federal
courthouse. The marshall became “shorter” with Asher when he presented his ID,
refused to allow him to take in his laptop, and questioned him about his name.
Gloria Cuttino, one of our clients, testified between Taylor
and Asher. Gloria does not have a PennDOT ID and has tried for more than a year
to get one. South Carolina, Gloria’s birth state, has no record of her birth.
According to testimony offered later by Michele Levy, an attorney with the
Homeless Advocacy Project, South
Carolina is one state that does not allow a third party, such as a relative or
an attorney, to sign on behalf of a person without ID.
Gloria registered to vote in 2008, has voted in elections
since then, and is eager to vote this year.
Today’s recap will be broken into two parts. Transcripts
from each day’s proceedings are available at this link,
as they become available.
Labels: Applewhite v. Commonwealth, voter ID, voting rights
2 Comments:
Wow. Great post, Andy. These plaintiffs are amazing. Your account gave me chills.
nike sb
supreme clothing
bape hoodie
supreme
moncler jacket
hermes bags
off white
cheap jordans
yeezy boost 350
off white
Post a Comment
<< Home