Let’s talk about boobies
by Molly
Tack-Hooper, ACLU-PA Staff Attorney
I think about breasts a lot. They have been central to both my
professional and personal life recently.
For the past two years, I’ve represented Kayla and Brianna, young
women who defied their middle school’s ban on the Keep a Breast Foundation’s “i [heart] boobies!” cancer awareness bracelets, and were suspended for wearing
the bracelets to school—on the school’s Breast Cancer Awareness Day.
According to the Easton Area School District, the bracelets are
inappropriate. Although it took the
school awhile to settle on a precise explanation, eventually the district
claimed that the phrase “i [heart] boobies!” was a sexual double entendre because
boobies—breasts—are an “inherently sexual” body part.
I beg to differ.
As a breastfeeding mother, half of Philadelphia has now seen my
boobs. Dozens of doctors, strangers in
coffee shops. All my friends. My whole extended family. My boss.
None of these interactions was sexual in the slightest.
At their best, my boobs are miraculous. They dispense milk that is perfectly
nutritionally balanced for my growing child.
No cooking, no dishes; my body produces instant comfort food that is
warm and ready to go whenever my son gets hungry.
At their worst, they are a source of intense pain, frustration,
and embarrassment. Breastfeeding ain’t
always easy, and it can take a hell of a toll on the nipples. My milk-laden boobs are often lopsided and
leaky. (And don’t even get me started on
breast pumping. Let’s just say I now
have a great deal of empathy for dairy cows.)
My boobs are many things. Sexual?
That’s not high on the list of
adjectives I’d use to describe my lactating breasts.
So why would a school tell twelve- and thirteen-year-old girls
that breasts are inherently sexual, and an inappropriate topic of conversation,
even on Breast Cancer Awareness Day?
The school’s reaction to the bracelets—and its take on breasts,
generally—is exactly what the Keep a Breast Foundation is trying to combat with
its “i [heart] boobies!” campaign. The
exuberant campaign seeks to start conversations with the bracelets, not only to
facilitate the exchange of information about breast cancer, but also to empower
young women to feel comfortable talking about their breasts. It uses the word “boobies”—a term so familiar
and comfortable that it’s how many adults teach little kids to refer to
breasts—because it’s not
clinical. It’s not scary. And discussion of
breasts should not be the exclusive domain of the health sciences, and it shouldn't be intimidating. And it
certainly needn't be sexual.
Maybe things would be better if the Keep a Breast Foundation had
been around when EASD’s lawyer and its middle school principals and I were
growing up. Maybe then discussion of
breasts by judges and middle schoolers wouldn't elicit giggles or admonishment
by adults. Maybe then writing a blog
post about my own boobs wouldn't feel quite so taboo. And maybe then no one would define breasts as
mere sexual objects.
We can’t turn back the clock and improve on the breast education adults
got when we were younger, but we can certainly stop standing in the way of progress. Our students deserve a safe space to discuss
boobies.
This post is part of a series in honor of Women's History Month.
Labels: free speech, students rights
1 Comments:
Speaking of breasts, can you imagine a birth mother being sent home after being coerced into an adoption plan with milk in her breasts and being told, oh don't worry you will meet a new man and start over, you will get over it. Or, a birth mother who has breast cancer and cannot communicate that to the child she lost to adoption because PA still has secret adoption laws in place. ACLU needs to understand the historical context of secret adoption and fight govt sealed records! AdopteesWithOutLiberty.com
Post a Comment
<< Home