You’ve Come a Long Way [Baby], But . . . .
by Carol
Petraitis, Duvall Reproductive Rights Project Director
The women’s suffrage (right-to-vote) movement was first articulated at the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848. Some states never barred women from voting; others began removing the barrier. Before the 19th Amendment a map of the country shows a distinctive geographic pattern -- the entire western portion of the U.S. plus Michigan and New York gave full suffrage to women, whereas the eastern seaboard from Pennsylvania to Florida allowed none. The middle portion of the country was somewhere in between.
Fast forward to 2012. State legislatures across the country are trying desperately to limit access to the right to vote by passing laws with onerous ID requirements. Pennsylvania is at the epicenter of that effort. The ACLU-PA, along with several ally organizations, is currently challenging the law’s constitutionality in state court. The vast majority of our clients are women, which is not a coincidence.
For a variety of reasons, women – in addition to people of color, low-income individuals, and young people – are particularly affected by voter ID laws. Women often change their names because of marriage or divorce, resulting in names that don’t match voter registration records. Women who have changed their names also need additional documentation, such as a marriage license, to obtain PennDOT ID.
Around the country there are possibly hundreds of thousands of women whose participation in the electoral process is threatened. We’ve come a long way -- but as we celebrate Women’s History Month, let us be aware that the rights of women to participate fully remain fragile.
This post is part of a series for Women’s History Month.
Labels: voting rights, women's rights
3 Comments:
Why is it that "women – in addition to people of color, low-income individuals, and young people" have so much more trouble with having a photo ID then anyone else not in those categories? The soft bigotry of low expectations. I guess we can't expect too much out of these groups - and so we must set the bar really low for them. Your zealous advocacy of this position should be embarrassing to thoughtful people, including anyone in these groups.
Nice, brief summary of voting issues and how it impacts women in particular.
I am surprised by this earlier post by Mr. Humes who wonders why these particular groups have more trouble having a photo ID, or assumes it's due to low expectations. The reasons were well covered in the newspapers and the ACLU-PA web site. They are simple facts such as those who live in cities don't need cars and don't have a driver's license. The elderly people of color may have been born in the Jim Crow south and never issued a birth certificate.
I hope Mr. Humes is not suggesting that only "thoughtful people" should be allowed to vote.
And women change names due to marriage and divorce, so sometimes their license and their voter registration doesn't match.
Post a Comment
<< Home