Wednesday, April 10, 2013

“Slap in the face” or constitutional obligation?

by Alexandra Morgan-Kurtz, ACLU-PA legal fellow

There are some mornings where you just have to wonder if government officials enjoy wasting taxpayer money and hurting their constituents. Today was one of those mornings.

ACLU request for inmate abortion policy riles Westmoreland controller,” read the headline. The controller, Jeff Balzer, has issues with the county’s obligation to pay for abortions, which he sees it as “a slap in the face.” I respect his right to that opinion, and his right to express it as vehemently as he wishes. What I take issue with is strong-arming his personal moral beliefs onto the women incarcerated at Westmoreland County Prison. Mr. Balzer isn’t objecting to the added costs - abortions cost hundreds of dollars; prenatal care and delivery can cost thousands of dollars. He’s objecting to the principle. There is simply no room for a heckler’s veto in the arena of fundamental constitutional rights. The law is clear that “[p]rison walls do not form a barrier separating prison inmates from the protections of the Constitution.” (Turner v. Safley) Whether Mr. Balzer likes it or not, this includes a woman’s right to choose.

The government has no general obligation to pay for a citizen’s medical care. Everything changes, however, when the government chooses to incarcerate someone. At that point, it is legally and morally bound to ensure that person’s safety and physical and mental well-being. People have argued for decades that it’s unfair that prisoners “get” these things when people who have committed no crimes receive far less. I agree there’s unfairness in the system. It’s unfair that our government has decided to only pay attention to people when they absolutely have to. It’s unfair that rather than address the problems of poverty and racial inequality, our government embraces a policy of overincarceration that continues vicious cycles and costs taxpayers millions of dollars each year.

I am all about fairness. If I had my way, we would quickly be following France’s lead and providing birth control and access to abortion at no cost. Regrettably, that isn’t going to happen in America any time soon. Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, incarcerated women aren’t left out in the cold. The Third Circuit has held that county prisons have an affirmative obligation to ensure that women receive timely access to abortions, and “[i]n the absence of alternative methods of funding, the County must assume the costs.” If the county doesn’t respect this right and a woman’s right to choose is obstructed or unreasonably delayed, the county could be faced with even more costly litigation. Incarcerated women are undoubtedly facing a crisis in their lives. The last thing they need is for the government to interfere in this very private matter.

Labels: , ,


Blogger mousiemarc said...

I have an objection to the cost of the prison system in general. We incarcerate far too many people for non violent crime. Then complain that we don't have the room for child molesters, murderers, and rapists. All of which at various times in our prison systems history have had their sentences reduced.

In my pie in the sky version of the "way it should be" we wouldn't even need half the prisons we currently have. We could fine those with blue collar crime, make them work with restrictions to their movement (we could have a massive ankle bracelet program across the country). I see no reason to incarcerate people when we can put them to work and make them productive.

As far as murderers, child molesters and such go? You will probably disagree with me but we need to make better use of the death penalty, and broaden it's scope. Truly violent crime that seeks to steal the future of another needs much stiffer consequences. A good number of child homicides happen when we let known child molesters out of prison. Even if they don't kill they usually molest again.

I know a former prison guard. He stated he spoke with multiple child molesters in prison (most of which come off very normal). He gained their trust, and they all admitted they would molest again once released. Your not going to fix them. Just my two cents. However, I also don't agree with paying for the medical costs of criminals while we tell hard working americans to just deal.

11:45 AM  
Blogger rekha verma said...

Our client can choose any of them as per their convenient. We are also open to send our angels any other place of your choice. Escorts Service in Gurgaonare waiting eagerly to meet you. You need to decide whether you want to meet them at home or at any hotel. If you are facing any challenges in arranging any place, let me inform you that we have tie-ups with 3 start hotels as well as 5 start hotels. Check our other services...
Russian Escorts in Faridabad
Call Girls in Gurgaon
Female Escorts in Gurgaon
Russian Escorts in Gurgaon

1:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home